<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VRYTEK &#187; Process</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vrytek.com/tag/process/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vrytek.com</link>
	<description>Domain &#38; Hosting News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:25:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>ICANN Slams American Advertisers For “Lack of Understanding”, Mischaracterising New gTLD Issues</title>
		<link>http://www.vrytek.com/icann-slams-american-advertisers-for-%e2%80%9clack-of-understanding%e2%80%9d-mischaracterising-new-gtld-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vrytek.com/icann-slams-american-advertisers-for-%e2%80%9clack-of-understanding%e2%80%9d-mischaracterising-new-gtld-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vrytek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assertion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[june-trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new gtlds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert-liodice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vrytek.com/icann-slams-american-advertisers-for-%e2%80%9clack-of-understanding%e2%80%9d-mischaracterising-new-gtld-issues/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ ICANN has slammed the American Association of National Advertisers for not understanding the new generic Top Level Domains process, saying the &#8220;assertions in your letter are either incorrect or problematic in several respects. Perhaps the most severe mischaracterisations concern the ICANN process.&#8221; The letter from Rod Beckstrom, ICANN CEO and President , to the ANA&#8217;s Robert Liodice, also CEO and President, is one of the most scathing letters the organisation has sent, repudiating assertions of what ICANN has, or has not done. The ANA originally wrote to ICANN earlier this month seething about the new gTLD process. But the organisation appears to have been asleep at the wheel as the process developing new gTLDs has been ongoing since around 2005 and the application guidebook was approved in June. Trademark holders/brand owners have been prolific in their views on the introduction of new gTLDs, driving changes to the applicant guidebook. While ICANN note that the ANA have previously participated in the consultation process back in 2008, one has to ask why the ANA has only seriously woken up to the process now. Back to the ICANN response. Beckstrom&#8217;s letter, repudiating the assertion there has been a lack of public comment, says that &#8220;multiple public meetings and at least 45 lengthy public comment periods were conducted and thousands of comments, representing a broad range of interests, were received&#8221; while all public comments, including those from the ANA, were considered in the decision-making process. One has to wonder if anyone at the ANA involved in writing the letter had actually read the applicant guidebook with its incorrect assertions. &#8220;Your letter also claims that the program represents &#8216;unrestricted expansion&#8217; or allows &#8216;virtually any word or phrase.&#8217; These statements demonstrate a lack of understanding of Program details. More research on your part would have revealed: (i) restrictions on delegation rates; (ii) string requirements and limitations; (iii) required applicant background, financial and technical qualifications; (iv) objection processes for infringing and other inappropriately applied-for strings; and (v) standing registry operator obligations in the registry agreement.&#8221; Another assertion refuted regards quotes from economic studies that claim more gTLDs will lead to security lapses and financial burdens. ICANN demolishes this assertion saying &#8220;your quotations from the economic studies are highly selective and lead to an unsupported conclusion that more domain names will lead to cyber security lapses or consumer privacy violations. Your claim of &#8216;enormous financial burdens&#8217; and other broad statements are offered without supporting data or rationale. I invite you to review the entire set of economic studies, which explored the current marketplace, and applied expert analysis to an examination of the potential risks and benefits as far as possible (noting that the benefits of innovation are difficult to predict).&#8221; The ANA also wrongly claims companies will have no choice but to apply for a gTLD. Something categorically denied by ICANN. One point the ANA did get right was that the economic &#8220;studies recommended the implementation of additional protections against trademark abuse and malicious conduct.&#8221; But as ICANN note, the organisation &#8220;formed teams of internationally recognised experts to adopt both these recommendations and incorporate many significant new safeguards into the program.&#8221; Some of the changes introduced into the guidebook were the establishment of a Trademark Clearinghouse and the implementation of a Uniform Rapid Suspension system. In 2008 when the ANA wrote to ICANN commenting on the new gTLD process, they suggested five specific proposals. One proposal concerned trademark protection, and ICANN say that as a result of theirs and other suggestions the IRT was introduced. Similarly with the other suggestions from the ANA transparency, registration information, application fees, general process issues and generic terms for TLDs such as bank and insurance, changes were made that reflected comments, largely satisfying the concerns of the ANA back then. In conclusion, ICANN say they &#8220;will vigorously defend the multi-stakeholder model and the hard-fought consensus of its global stakeholder participants, its duty to act in accordance with established bottom-up processes, and its responsibility to the broad public interest of the global Internet community, rather than to the specific interests of any particular group.&#8221; &#8220;As you may be aware, ICANN&#8217;s activities extend beyond this program. It works for the benefit of the public interest, including your organisation, in ways large and small.&#8221; All in all this belated outburst by the ANA being critical of the new gTLD process when their original concerns were largely addressed with changes made to the application process must be deeply embarrassing to the organisation. And ANA members should be very concerned about how the organisation represents them. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vrytek.com/icann-slams-american-advertisers-for-%e2%80%9clack-of-understanding%e2%80%9d-mischaracterising-new-gtld-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Jump Ship From GoDaddy To A Better Web Host And Registrar &#8211; Lifehacker Australia</title>
		<link>http://www.vrytek.com/how-to-jump-ship-from-godaddy-to-a-better-web-host-and-registrar-lifehacker-australia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vrytek.com/how-to-jump-ship-from-godaddy-to-a-better-web-host-and-registrar-lifehacker-australia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 01:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vrytek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Account]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain-manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Godaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registrar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transfer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vrytek.com/how-to-jump-ship-from-godaddy-to-a-better-web-host-and-registrar-lifehacker-australia/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Regardless of your feelings about GoDaddy’s moral standing , its service is frustrating and restrictive. If you’re sick of paying for crappy hosting and want to jump ship, here’s how to leave GoDaddy behind for one of many better web hosts on the net. A Personal Note: Why GoDaddy Sucks A lot of people feel they shouldn’t support GoDaddy because GoDaddy CEO Bob Parsons shot an elephant ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vrytek.com/how-to-jump-ship-from-godaddy-to-a-better-web-host-and-registrar-lifehacker-australia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sedo Improves Sign-Up Process</title>
		<link>http://www.vrytek.com/sedo-improves-sign-up-process/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vrytek.com/sedo-improves-sign-up-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vrytek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all-posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allow-buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buying-domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[easier-access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frank-michlick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permanent-link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[their-sign-up]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vrytek.com/sedo-improves-sign-up-process/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 04&#124;07&#124;2011 1:09 pm EDT Sedo Improves Sign-Up Process by Frank Michlick in Categories: Up to the Minute - 0 Comments Sedo has announced imrpovements to their sign-up process today. They also added a certification via phone-verification. The goal of the changes is to allow buyers easier access to buying domain names. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vrytek.com/sedo-improves-sign-up-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICANN Moves Customer Domains from Blue Gravity Moozoy to NamesBeyond</title>
		<link>http://www.vrytek.com/icann-moves-customer-domains-from-blue-gravity-moozoy-to-namesbeyond/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vrytek.com/icann-moves-customer-domains-from-blue-gravity-moozoy-to-namesbeyond/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 14:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vrytek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hosting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moozooy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pdf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registrar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registrars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vrytek.com/icann-moves-customer-domains-from-blue-gravity-moozoy-to-namesbeyond/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ An image of the notice of de-accreditation sent to Blue Gravity Inc. (WEB HOST INDUSTRY REVIEW) -- Internet and domain governing body ICANN ( www.icann.org ) issued a notice on Wednesday that it had authorized the bulk transfers of customer domains from Blue Gravity Inc. and Moozooy Media Inc. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vrytek.com/icann-moves-customer-domains-from-blue-gravity-moozoy-to-namesbeyond/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Hosted Blackberry Service</title>
		<link>http://www.vrytek.com/new-hosted-blackberry-service/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vrytek.com/new-hosted-blackberry-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vrytek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berry-service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exchange-online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hosted-black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hosted-blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[month-on-how]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[release-later]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vrytek.com/new-hosted-blackberry-service/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ New Hosted Blackberry Service Thursday, March 17, 2011, 9:41:40 AM Blackberry business customers using Microsoft’s Exchange 2010 online email service could be in for a treat in the coming months as there’s rumours that RIM and Microsoft are set to release a Hosted Blackberry Enterprise Service (BES). ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vrytek.com/new-hosted-blackberry-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICANN Seeks Expressions of Interest for Registrar Data Escrow Service</title>
		<link>http://www.vrytek.com/icann-seeks-expressions-of-interest-for-registrar-data-escrow-service/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vrytek.com/icann-seeks-expressions-of-interest-for-registrar-data-escrow-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 22:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vrytek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain-name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occasions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pdf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registrars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reoi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[such-as-use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vrytek.com/icann-seeks-expressions-of-interest-for-registrar-data-escrow-service/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ ICANN launched its Registrar Data Escrow (RDE) program in November 2007 in order to help protect domain name registrants in the event of the failure or de-accreditation of their registrars. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vrytek.com/icann-seeks-expressions-of-interest-for-registrar-data-escrow-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GlobalSign Gains Most SSL Certificates in February Netcraft Survey &#8211; Web Host Industry Review</title>
		<link>http://www.vrytek.com/globalsign-gains-most-ssl-certificates-in-february-netcraft-survey-web-host-industry-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vrytek.com/globalsign-gains-most-ssl-certificates-in-february-netcraft-survey-web-host-industry-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vrytek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deployments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve-waite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-deployments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[using-the-ssl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vrytek.com/globalsign-gains-most-ssl-certificates-in-february-netcraft-survey-web-host-industry-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ This diagram shows the process of HackAlert (WEB HOST INDUSTRY REVIEW) -- Digital certificate provider GlobalSign ( www.globalsign.com ) announced on Tuesday that it has shown the largest increase in the number of SSL Certificates active for the month of February, according to the Netcraft SSL survey. GlobalSign says it has added 2000 new secure sites a month, making its SSL technology "adopted at a faster rate than the other leading SSL providers" including Symantec, GoDaddy and Comodo]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vrytek.com/globalsign-gains-most-ssl-certificates-in-february-netcraft-survey-web-host-industry-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GlobalSign Gains Most SSL Certificates in February Netcraft Survey</title>
		<link>http://www.vrytek.com/globalsign-gains-most-ssl-certificates-in-february-netcraft-survey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vrytek.com/globalsign-gains-most-ssl-certificates-in-february-netcraft-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vrytek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hosting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009-the-number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certificates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief-marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diagram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netcraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[using-the-ssl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vrytek.com/globalsign-gains-most-ssl-certificates-in-february-netcraft-survey/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ This diagram shows the process of HackAlert (WEB HOST INDUSTRY REVIEW) -- Digital certificate provider GlobalSign ( www.globalsign.com ) announced on Tuesday that it has shown the largest increase in the number of SSL Certificates active for the month of February, according to the Netcraft SSL survey. GlobalSign says it has added 2000 new secure sites a month, making its SSL technology "adopted at a faster rate than the other leading SSL providers" including Symantec, GoDaddy and Comodo. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vrytek.com/globalsign-gains-most-ssl-certificates-in-february-netcraft-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>.NL Registrar Association On The Way</title>
		<link>http://www.vrytek.com/nl-registrar-association-on-the-way/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vrytek.com/nl-registrar-association-on-the-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 10:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vrytek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[everything-went]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registrar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sidn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stakeholder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supervisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-stakeholder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thus-satisfying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vrytek.com/nl-registrar-association-on-the-way/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ A registrar association for the .NL ccTLD is in the process of being established with SIDN, the registry, announcing that significant progress has been made. The intention is that the registrar association should take up the role of the now defunct Council of Registrars, thus satisfying the general wish for a formal channel of communication between SIDN and the registrar community. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vrytek.com/nl-registrar-association-on-the-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GAC Continues To Delay New gTLDs While Supporting Trademark Holders</title>
		<link>http://www.vrytek.com/gac-continues-to-delay-new-gtlds-while-supporting-trademark-holders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vrytek.com/gac-continues-to-delay-new-gtlds-while-supporting-trademark-holders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 14:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vrytek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[answers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bidding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[level-domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[milton-mueller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spotlight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vrytek.com/gac-continues-to-delay-new-gtlds-while-supporting-trademark-holders/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Last week’s meeting in Brussels between ICANN and their Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) regarding the new generic Top Level Domains (gTLDs) was a like a car “wreck” writes Milton Mueller on the Internet Governance blog. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vrytek.com/gac-continues-to-delay-new-gtlds-while-supporting-trademark-holders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

